Hello blockchain and crypto enthusiasts! Jason back again, bringing you even more dank insights from Calloutcoin.com. Today, we're diving deep into a critical area for the future of decentralized physical infrastructure networks (DePINs): security. As DePINs expand to maintain more real-world infrastructure, making sure their networks are cyber threats robust should be the priority. In this post, we’ll take a look at how blockchain-based traceable authentication, especially when augmented by government-issued electronic IDs (eIDs), can transform DePIN security.
Introduction to Decentralized Confidential Computing
Decentralized Physical Infrastructure Networks (DePINs) are a radical new way of deploying, managing, and scaling physical infrastructure. Rather than turning to centralized authorities, DePINs rely on blockchain-enabled governance, tokenized incentives, and community-sourced participation to deploy and manage infrastructure. This new and exciting playbook decentralizes ownership and operations. It tackles the inefficiencies, high operating costs, and inequitable access that too frequently infect legacy infrastructure systems. DePINs present a unique opportunity for private sector leaders to explore the Web3 space.
This new, and very exciting, world isn’t without its pitfalls. Cybersecurity risks Like any digital platform, DePINs are vulnerable to cybersecurity threats. These threats range from hacking attempts to software bugs to other system vulnerabilities. To safeguard public infrastructure and connected networks, DePIN projects must be cyberattack conscious and ensure data across the network is transmitted securely. This is where blockchain-based traceable authentication comes in, providing a proven solution to improve DePIN security and trustworthiness.
DEPINs leverage the unique characteristics of blockchain technology such as immutability, decentralization, and smart contracts. This is a step towards a more transparent, secure, and resilient operation of critical infrastructure. DEPIN transactions are automatically logged on the blockchain. This shared database contains an immutable ledger of all transactions ever processed on the network. This transparency greatly increases the accountability and auditability of an RVP. Unlike cash, every single transaction is recorded on a blockchain, providing an easy to follow, irrefutable trail of activity.
The Evolution of Data Computation & Security
Throughout the history of data computation, there’s always been that one continuous thread of increased efficiency, accessibility, and security. In the initial phases of computing, we were dependent on the data center. Mainframes and dedicated servers handed a good part of the computational burden. When computers got powerful enough to be called servers, distributed computing became possible with the ability to spread workloads across many machines and networks. While this increased scalability and fault tolerance, it created new complexities of data security and privacy.
The internet and cloud computing ascendancy has revolutionized how we compute on data. Even so, now the expectation is that anyone can get everything they need anywhere, anytime. Simultaneously, this better accessibility to data has left it more susceptible to cyber warfare and malicious attacks. Because of this, agencies are striving to emphasize building security into robust strategies. They don’t want sensitive data ending up in an adversary’s hands.
More conventional security measures including firewalls, IDS, and encryption have become essential to protecting data. Unfortunately, these protections are frequently not enough to defend organizations from the rapidly changing threat landscape. In fact, from a cybersecurity perspective, centralized data storage and processing models are still vulnerable to single points of failure and insider threats. This has led to significant research and development interest in decentralized and privacy-preserving computing paradigms. One such solution is decentralized confidential computing (DeCC), where data and computation are distributed across several different parties but the confidentiality and integrity of the data are ensured.
Understanding the Need for Enhanced Data Privacy
As our society has become more data-driven, the call for improved data privacy protections has grown stronger than ever. People and businesses are creating and using more data than ever. This information runs the gamut from personal ID credentials and financial records to health information and trade secrets. This information is incredibly powerful — but incredibly dangerous if it isn’t adequately safeguarded.
This seems impossible, given that data breaches and privacy violations have now become routine and predictable, causing billions in financial losses, reputational damage, and loss of trust. These events underscore the dangers of these ongoing centralized data storage and processing paradigm. Just one point of failure can quickly put millions of sensitive data into the hands of nefarious actors. Even absent mind, human error is a great conduit to unintended data misuse. Incomplete or improper security measures may lead to accidental disclosures as well.
To address these challenges, privacy-enhancing technologies (PETs) are highly sought after. This is made possible by these technologies, which support data processing and analysis without ever revealing the raw data itself. These technologies implement state-of-the-art tools such as encryption, differential privacy, and secure multi-party computation. They further empower users to use data for innovative and invaluable new applications all while maintaining the privacy of individuals and organizations. Together with our partners, we are realizing the power of data by welcoming these technologies with open arms. Equally important, we can lower the threat of data breaches and privacy infringements.
Comparing Traditional Data Processing with Decentralized Confidential Computing
Modern data processing has often relied on centralized architectures — moving and processing data in centralized data warehouses or cloud data lakes. While this hub and spoke model provides benefits of convenience and scalability, it presents a host of new security and privacy threats. In a centralized model, data is at risk from insider threats, external attacks, and government surveillance. Users have little knowledge or ability to manage how their data is used and processed. This leads to especially troubling issues with data ownership and consent.
Decentralized Confidential Computing (DeCC) offers a new approach to these shortcomings. This novel approach distributes data and computation across demanding multi-party ecosystems, while ensuring confidentiality of data, integrity of computation, and transparency. Within a DeCC context, one important way to protect data is through encryption. We use privacy-enhancing technologies (PETs) including zero-knowledge proofs, multi-party computation, and homomorphic encryption to process that data securely. These technologies allow us to use data in many different ways. First, they protect the privacy of the people, companies, and nonprofits that provide the underlying information.
By decentralizing where data is stored and processed, DeCC makes single points of failure and insider threats much less risky. Plus, it provides users more meaningful control over their data. Much more importantly, they should be allowed to determine how their data is utilized and treated. DeCC unlocks innovative new use cases that worries about privacy used to make infeasible. Today, we are able to share data securely, conduct analytics in a privacy-preserving manner, and maintain decentralized identities.
Vulnerabilities in the Data Lifecycle
The data lifecycle refers to stages involved in data processing, from creation and collection, to storage, processing and ultimate deletion. Each stage of the data lifecycle presents security and privacy vulnerabilities. To provide a better degree of protection to sensitive information, we need to tackle these matters.
- Data creation and collection: Data can be compromised during the creation and collection phase if it is not properly encrypted or anonymized. For example, if personal information is collected without proper consent or security measures, it can be vulnerable to interception or unauthorized access.
- Data storage: Storing data in centralized locations makes it vulnerable to insider threats, external attacks, and government surveillance. Data breaches can occur if storage systems are not properly secured or if access controls are not properly enforced.
- Data processing: Processing data in the clear exposes it to potential privacy violations. Data can be inadvertently disclosed or misused if it is not properly anonymized or if privacy-preserving technologies are not used.
- Data deletion: Even after data is deleted, it can still be recovered using forensic techniques. To ensure that data is permanently erased, it must be securely overwritten or physically destroyed.
These vulnerabilities can be heavily mitigated by employing best security and privacy practices at each phase of the data lifecycle. You know you can protect data in transit and at rest with encryption. Further, employ access controls to limit exposure to sensitive information and privacy enhancing technologies while processing.
Limitations of Transparency in Cryptography
Transparency is often assumed to be a good thing in all circumstances. It can spawn immense confusion in the cryptographic space. In conventional cryptographic systems, transparency enables participants to independently confirm the accuracy of processes. It’s supposed to guarantee the integrity of those cryptographic processes. This very transparency is what can make sensitive information susceptible to malicious actors, violating the very privacy and security that cryptographic systems seek to provide.
In a traditional public-key cryptosystem, the public key is intentionally made public. This makes it possible for anybody to encrypt messages meant for the possessor of the corresponding private key. However, the public key can be used to mount different attacks, including key-recovery attacks or chosen-ciphertext attacks. In a digital signature scheme, the signature itself is transacted on or exposed to the public sphere by design. This enables anyone to quickly check the validity of the corresponding signed message. With the signature comes the opportunity to initiate many attacks including signature forgery attack or replay attack.
To address these limitations, researchers have created a number of privacy-enhancing cryptographic techniques. These avoidance tactics are designed to help corporations avoid transparency, and they do. These methods comprise zero-knowledge proofs, which allow a party to prove the truth of a statement without revealing any information about the statement itself. They cover homomorphic encryption, which enables calculations to be performed on encrypted information without having to first decrypt it.
Trustless Confidential Computing through DeCC
Trustless confidential computing (DeCC) constitutes a new paradigm. Its goal is to allow secure and private computations to be performed without a need for trusted third parties. In a DeCC system, data is encrypted and processed using privacy-enhancing technologies (PETs) such as zero-knowledge proofs, multi-party computation, and homomorphic encryption. Together, these technologies maximize our ability to harness data for a million different uses. They protect the underlying data, which keeps families’ and businesses’ information private.
DeCC also differs from conventional confidential computing approaches. It runs completely independently of any trusted hardware or TEEs. Instead, it uses a combination of advanced cryptographic techniques and distributed protocols to secure the privacy of computation. This removes the possibility of single points of failure and insider threat. Thus, DeCC is a more comprehensive and credible remedy.
DeCC unlocks a host of new use cases that were once not feasible because of privacy issues. For one, it can be used to allow for secure data sharing between unrelated organizations, conduct privacy-preserving data analytics, and facilitate decentralized identity management. With the right approach, DeCC can change the game in industries as varied as healthcare, finance, and government. In each of these sectors, protecting privacy and security is deeply essential.
Key Technologies in Decentralized Confidential Computing
Decentralized Confidential Computing (DeCC) employs a variety of cryptographic methods. These technologies combine to ensure the integrity of computations while protecting their privacy. Among these technologies are zero-knowledge proofs, multi-party computation, garbled circuits, fully homomorphic encryption, and trusted execution environments.
Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKP)
Zero-knowledge proofs (ZKPs) are extremely powerful cryptographic protocols for proving knowledge of information without revealing it. They allow a prover to prove the truthfulness of a statement to a verifier without revealing any information regarding the statement. In other words, the verifier doesn’t learn anything about the statement itself beyond knowing that the statement is true.
ZKPs have various applications in DeCC such as authentication, privacy-preserving data sharing and secure multi-party computation. Specifically, the use of ZKPs allows a user to mathematically prove that they hold a valid credential. They are able to do this without actually disclosing the credential in question. These tools allow three or more parties to jointly compute an arbitrary function. They manage to accomplish all of this while doing so with their proprietary private inputs never being known to each other.
ZKPs rely on sophisticated mathematical foundations and cryptography, including elliptic curve cryptography and hash functions. In practice, they are usually deployed via custom technology software frameworks and application-specific hardware accelerators.
Multi-Party Computation (MPC)
Multi-party computation (MPC) is an incredibly effective cryptographic tool. It allows several different entities to jointly calculate a function based on their respective private inputs without revealing those inputs to each other. Each stakeholder actively participates in providing their data into the calculation. The resulting score is then made public to all parties, but no single party ever learns the specific inputs of the other parties.
An area of MPC’s application in DeCC lies with providing secure data-sharing, privacy-preserving analytics, and decentralized decision-making processes. For example, MPC can be used to allow multiple hospitals to share patient data for research purposes without revealing the individual patient records. It can be used to facilitate a competitive process in which multiple firms work on a project but protect their proprietary data from each other.
In short, MPC protocols are usually built on cryptographic primitives like secret sharing, homomorphic encryption and garbled circuits. They tend to be realized with the help of custom software frameworks for deep learning and corresponding hardware accelerators.
Garbled Circuits (GC)
Garbled circuits (GCs) allow two mutually mistrusting parties to jointly compute a function over their private inputs securely. This method is a magic trick that allows them to keep each others’ inputs hidden. In a GC protocol, one party, called the garbler, constructs a garbled circuit of the function. At the same time, the second party, known as the evaluator, takes their private input and uses it to evaluate the garbled circuit.
Useful cryptographic primitives like GCs are based on cryptographic techniques like symmetric encryption and oblivious transfer. They are usually only possible with specialized software libraries and hardware accelerators.
Fully Homomorphic Encryption (FHE)
Fully homomorphic encryption (FHE) is an advanced, emerging cryptographic method. It allows you to do calculations on encrypted data without having to decrypt it at any point. In other words, encrypted data can be processed and returned without the underlying data ever being decrypted or exposed in the clear.
FHE could be applied broadly across most use cases in DeCC such as secure collaborative data sharing, privacy-preserving federated analytics, and decentralized decision-making. For example, FHE can be used to allow a cloud service provider to process a user's data without ever seeing the data in the clear. He said it can be employed to let multiple parties work together on a project without disclosing their proprietary information.
FHE involves some hefty mathematical abstractions. It leverages cutting-edge cryptographic techniques such as lattice-based cryptography and ring learning with errors (RLWE). In practice, it is usually applied with the help of dedicated software libraries and hardware accelerators.
>Trusted Execution Environments (TEE)
Trusted execution environments (TEEs) provide secure enclaves in a processor. They provide a protected environment for executing code and storing data securely. TEEs are physically separated from the device’s operating system and other software. This isolation makes them extremely resistant to malware and other cyber attacks.
TEEs are currently being used in DeCC for a range of purposes. Through them, they ensure secure key management, enable secure data storage, and facilitate secure code execution. TEEs securely cache sensitive cryptographic keys. Together, they provide a means to execute extremely sensitive code while protecting it from access and in some cases even tampering by the operating system itself. They’re useful for safeguarding data from abuse, whether it’s unintentional corruption or intentional manipulation.
In practice, TEEs have been realized through various specialized hardware and software component architectures, like Intel SGX and ARM TrustZone. They are increasingly being incorporated into other mobile electronic devices, servers and advanced computing platforms.
Hybrid Approaches in Composable DeCC Stacks
In reality, DeCC systems often employ hybrid methods in practice. They layer numerous cryptographic methods and technologies on top of one another to achieve robust security and privacy properties. A DeCC system could make use of zero-knowledge proofs to privately authenticate users. It uses multi-party computation for secure, decentralized data sharing and fully homomorphic encryption to guarantee privacy-preserving analytics.
The point at which you decide to use which technologies comes down to the needs of your application. If resilience is the overriding goal, a DeCC system will use a combination of all methods. This gives them the best possible balance between security and efficiency. If protecting privacy is your highest priority, a DeCC system can use methods to further protect and guarantee that privacy. Note that these approaches can leave efficiency on the table.
Composable DeCC stacks mean combining multiple DeCC technologies and systems as building blocks to develop more complex and/or versatile solutions. This approach allows developers to leverage the strengths of different DeCC techniques to address a wider range of security and privacy challenges.
The Role of Venture Capital and Developer Engagement in DeCC
Indeed, venture capital (VC) has been instrumental in enabling the innovation and diffusion of DeCC technologies. VC firms have a role to play by making bets on the most promising startups and companies pursuing disruptive DeCC solutions. This funding allows these companies to hire the best and brightest engineers, invest in robust R&D and scale their operations.
Alongside the earlier steps taken to improve process, stakeholder engagement is key for DeCC’s success. Developers, on the other hand, will gain a clearer path toward building and deploying DeCC applications. It is very important that we give them the tools, development, and assistance they need to succeed. That means giving them access to open-source software libraries, documentation, and training materials. It means building a tech community to mobilize diverse minds necessary to foster innovative solutions.
Overview of the Decentralized Confidential Computing Ecosystem
The Decentralized Confidential Computing (DeCC) ecosystem is rapidly growing and the space is undoubtedly exciting. Thousands of new projects and new companies are coming up with breakthrough technology to create a secure and private computation. These projects both widely and creatively push the use of numerous existing, to cutting edge, cryptographic technologies. They are fully homomorphic encryption, garbled circuits, multi-party computation, trusted execution environments, and zero-knowledge proofs.
Projects Utilizing Fully Homomorphic Encryption (FHE)
Fully Homomorphic Encryption (FHE) enables you to perform complex computations on encrypted data. This approach helps ensure that your data stays private and secure throughout the development process. Several projects are actively exploring and implementing FHE in their solutions:
- Fhenix: Fhenix is building a confidential smart contract platform using FHE, enabling developers to create decentralized applications that protect user data and privacy.
- Mind Network: Mind Network focuses on creating a decentralized knowledge graph using FHE, allowing for secure and private data analysis and sharing.
- Octra: Octra provides FHE-based solutions for secure data marketplaces, enabling users to monetize their data without revealing the underlying information.
Projects Utilizing Garbled Circuits (GC)
Garbled Circuits (GC) underlie secure two-party computation. This enables two or more parties to jointly compute a function of their inputs without revealing their inputs to each other. Projects leveraging GC include:
- COTI: COTI is developing a privacy-preserving payment system using GC, allowing for secure and anonymous transactions.
- Soda Labs: Soda Labs is building a platform for secure data analytics using GC, enabling organizations to collaborate on data analysis without compromising data privacy.
Projects Utilizing Multi-Party Computation (MPC)
Multi-Party Computation (MPC) allows multiple parties to jointly compute a function on their private inputs without revealing them to each other. Notable projects in this space include:
- Arcium: Arcium is creating a decentralized platform for secure multi-party computation, enabling organizations to collaborate on data analysis and decision-making without compromising data privacy.
- Partisia Blockchain: Partisia Blockchain is building a privacy-preserving blockchain using MPC, enabling secure and confidential transactions and smart contracts.
Projects Utilizing Trusted Execution Environments (TEE)
Trusted Execution Environments (TEE) provide a secure enclave within a processor for executing code and storing data, isolated from the operating system and other software. Projects utilizing TEEs include:
- iExec: iExec is building a decentralized marketplace for computing resources using TEEs, enabling users to securely rent out their computing power and access a wide range of applications.
- Marlin: Marlin is developing a layer-0 networking protocol that uses TEEs to enhance the security and privacy of blockchain networks.
- Phala Network: Phala Network is building a confidential smart contract platform using TEEs, enabling developers to create decentralized applications that protect user data and privacy.
- Secret Network: Secret Network is a privacy-first blockchain that uses TEEs to enable confidential smart contracts and data storage.
- TEN:> TEN is building a layer-2 scaling solution for Ethereum that uses TEEs to provide secure and private transactions.
Projects Utilizing Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKP)
Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKP) allow one party to prove the truth of a statement to another party without revealing any information about the statement itself. Projects leveraging ZKP include:
- Aleph Zero & Common: Aleph Zero is building a privacy-enhancing blockchain that uses ZKPs to enable confidential transactions and smart contracts. Common is a ZKP framework designed to make it easier to build privacy-preserving applications.
- Aleo: Aleo is building a privacy-preserving platform for decentralized applications using ZKPs, enabling developers to create applications that protect user data and privacy.
- >Penumbra: Penumbra is a shielded cryptocurrency protocol that uses ZKPs to provide private and confidential transactions.
Projects in Decentralized Privacy Networks (DePIN + Private Data Routing)
DePINs use decentralized physical infrastructure and private data routing to establish more secure, privacy-preserving networks. Projects in this space include:
- Anyone Protocol: Anyone Protocol is building a decentralized VPN that uses blockchain technology to provide secure and private internet access.
- **Silent